Posts Tagged ‘Flagstaff Divorce Attorney’

« Older Entries

Arizona Attorney Discusses Jurisdiction Issues in Custody Cases

Thursday, April 21st, 2011

Under Arizona law, Arizona courts typically have jurisdiction over new divorce, custody, paternity, and other cases involving children so long as the child has resided in the state of Arizona for the 6 months preceding the commencement of the case. Once Arizona obtains jurisdiction, the courts will generally continue to have jurisdiction so long as either parent continues to reside in the state of Arizona.

If both parents have relocated out of the state, a new state may have jurisdiction. Occasionally the parties can consent to jurisdiction in another state. Courts in Arizona or other states can get involved on an emergency basis when necessary, even when that court or state would not have ongoing jurisdiction.

Most states have similar or identical laws regarding jurisdiction over custody issues.

If a case has been filed against you in Arizona, and you do not believe that Arizona has jurisdiction, an attorney with McGuire Gardner, PLLC can file a Motion to Dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction. If you would like to file a case in Arizona and you are not certain if Arizona has jurisdiction over some or all of the pending issues, you should also speak with one of the family law attorneys with McGuire Gardner, PLLC. To contact an attorney with McGuire Gardner, PLLC to discuss your custody issues, you may call (480) 829-9081 or visit us online at www.yourarizonadivorcelawyer.com.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in family law | No Comments »

East Valley Family Law Lawyer Discusses Division Of Businesses In Divorce

Wednesday, April 6th, 2011

Arizona law requires the equitable division of community property and jointly owned property. Even in cases where the property is the sole and separate property of one spouse, the law in certain instances recognizes that the other spouse may have an equitable interest in the property for any increase in value attributed to the finances or effort of the marital community during the marriage. Generally, equitable division requires an equal division, though there are certain exceptions where an unequal division may be most equitable or fair.

In many divorce or legal separation cases, one or both parties own a business, medical practice, or other professional practice. Generally these businesses or practices were started and built during the marriage, though in some cases the business was started prior to the marriage and has increased in value during the marriage.

In each such case, both spouses have a legal and/or equitable interest in the business, and the value of the business must be equitably divided as part of the divorce case. Often, the business will need to be valuated or appraised. There are many issues that arise including the type of appraisal, the date of the appraisal, whether the appraisal includes the goodwill value of the business or only the tangible assets, etc.

These are complex cases, in which an experienced and knowledgeable attorney is imperative. If you are contemplating a divorce, or are already involved in a divorce, and you would like to speak with an attorney who has handled many complex divorce cases involving the division of businesses, please call McGuire Gardner today for a free initial telephonic consultation. Call us at (480) 829-9081, or visit us at www.YourArizonaDivorceLawyer.com.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in family law | No Comments »

Arizona Lawyer Discusses Effect of Wage Garnishment By Creditors When Child Support or Spousal Maintenance (Alimony) Is Paid

Wednesday, March 16th, 2011

In all dissolutions of marriage entered after January 1, 1988, and in any modifications of orders entered after that date, where child support payments are ordered, a wage assignment is automatically entered in favor of the person or agency entitled to receive the support payments. A.R.S. § 25-504(A).

In a proceeding in which spousal maintenance is ordered, the court may enter a wage assignment on either party’s request, but the wage assignment is not mandatory. Id.

Wage assignments issued pursuant to A.R.S. § 25-504, for either child support or spousal maintenance, have priority over all other attachments, executions, garnishments or assignments. A.R.S. §§ 12-1598.14(B) and 25-504(P).

Where a judgment debtor’s earnings become subject to more than one writ of garnishment, and of spousal and child support priority a judgment creditor recovers no nonexempt earnings for two consecutive paydays, the lien on earnings of such judgment creditor is invalid and of no force and effect, and the garnishee shall notify the judgment creditor accordingly. A.R.S. § 12-1598.14(C).

Garnishment limits for creditors (except for child support or spousal support) is up to 25% of a person’s gross wages. For child support and spousal support, the limit is up to 50% of a person’s gross wages.

In some cases, it may be advantageous to ensure that child support or spousal support is being paid by a wage assignment. Because of the priority for child support and spousal support wage garnishments, your income deduction will be going to support your children or ex spouse, which is generally preferable to the money going to a credit card company or other debt collector.

If you would like to discuss child support, spousal support, or other family law issues with an attorney, please call McGuire Gardner, PLLC at (800) 899-2730 or visit our website at www.YourArizonaDivorceLawyer.com.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in family law | No Comments »

Arizona Family Law Attorney Discusses High Conflict Custody Cases

Thursday, January 13th, 2011

When recently in Court, one of the Judges commented on the high conflict in a case I am currently working on. To the parties, he let them know that most parents finalize their divorce and never need to return to Court. Of those that do need to return to Court, most of them only need to return a single time. However, there are a small minority of cases, known as high conflict cases, where the parents do not learn to communicate and work together to resolve difficulties that inevitably arise while raising children.

Though divorced, parents must still continue to work together as business partners, in the business of raising children. While the emotional involvement of the past may be completely gone, both parents must work together to ensure the best interest of the children. This can be difficult when one parent or both parents are shortsighted, self-centered, or unwilling to compromise and negotiate. Such cases often return to Court every few years for adjustments to the prior orders.

More often, if adjustments are needed, an experienced family law attorney can assist you in drawing up amendments or stipulations to modify prior orders based upon agreements reached between the parties. Proceeding without significant involvement of the Court reduces the cost and the emotional toll of high conflict cases. If you need to make adjustments or changes to your parenting orders or parenting agreements, and whether or not your case is high conflict or an agreement has already been reached but needs to be properly documented in an appropriate legal format, please call the family law attorneys at McGuire Gardner, PLLC at 800 899 2730 for your free initial telephonic consultation.

For more information, please visit our websites:

www.mcguiregardner.com or

www.yourarizonadivorcelawyer.com

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

ARIZONA FAMILY LAW ATTORNEY DISCUSSES RETROACTIVE CHILD SUPPORT

Monday, January 3rd, 2011

In Arizona, either party may ask the Court to change child support when there has been a significant and continuing change in the factors for calculating child support. This can be the increase or reduction of the income of either party, a change in medical insurance costs or availability, an increase or decrease in day care or child care costs, or the emancipation of one or more children.

Child support does not automatically change, and must be changed through the court process. A change can only become effective on the first day of the month following the commencement of a case to modify child support and service upon the other party.

If you need assistance modifying child support in your case, or if the other party has asked the Court to modify child support and you do not agree with the requested change, please feel free to contact the attorneys at McGuire Gardner for a free initial telephone consultation to discuss your case, by calling (800) 899-2730.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in family law | No Comments »

TEMPE/EAST VALLEY ATTORNEY DISCUSSES ATTORNEYS FEES

Friday, July 16th, 2010

TEMPE/EAST VALLEY ATTORNEY DISCUSSES ATTORNEYS FEES

The Court in Family Law and Divorce cases has the ability to order one party to pay all or some portion of the other party’s attorneys’ fees and costs.  The Court will look at two issues in determining if such an order is appropriate.

First, the Court will look at the income and financial status of each party.  The Court has the discretion to order the party with greater financial assets and income to pay all or some portion of the other party’s attorneys fees.

Second, the Court will consider the reasonableness of the positions taken by each party.

While the Court may make and award of attorneys fees for either or both issues, the Court must consider both issues before making an award of attorneys fees.

For more information, or to contact an Arizona divorce lawyer, please check out our website at www.yourarizondivorcelawyer.com.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in family law | No Comments »

Can An Order Of Protection Include Animals?

Thursday, June 17th, 2010

Can An Order Of Protection Include Animals?

Effective July 29, 2010, Senate Bill 1266 which was passed into law (Ch. 276)(2010), will allow a party obtaining an Order of Protection to obtain exclusive custody of a pet or animal and preclude the other party from coming near the animal.

Specifically, the new law states that the “judicial officer may also grant the plaintiff the exclusive care, custody, or control of any animal that is owned, possessed, leased, kept, or held by the plaintiff, the defendant, or a minor child residing in the residence or household of the plaintiff or the defendant, and order the defendant to stay away from the animal and forbid the defendant from taking, transferring, encumbering, concealing, committing an act of cruelty or neglect in violation of Section 13-2910, or otherwise disposing of the animal.”

To learn more or to schedule your free initial consultation by telephone please call us at (480) 829-9081 or visit us at www.yourarizonadivorcelawyer.com

Tags: , , , , ,
Posted in family law | No Comments »

Spanking and Discipline During and After an Arizona Divorce

Wednesday, June 9th, 2010

Spanking and Discipline During and After an Arizona Divorce

While there is no law against spanking children as part of an overall discipline system, and many mental health professional agree that an occasional and properly used spanking may be an effective tool in raising children, parents going through a divorce or who have gone through a divorce should be very cautious about spanking their children.

During marriage, when both parents are working together as a team and support one another, spanking may be appropriate.  However, too often a spanking during a pending divorce or after a divorce may be blown out of proportion and designated by the other parent as child abuse or abusive behavior.  An unsporting parent can use a spanking to turn children away from the spanking parent as a form of parental alienation, or use the incident to commence a long and drawn out court battle.

Additionally, a spanked child that is in a loving home with two loving parents may receive a completely different message than would a child who is filled with self-doubts and confusion caused by the loss of his or her family and the structure that he or she was accustomed to prior to the divorce.  Children struggling with emotional setbacks may not respond the same to a spanking.

Furthermore, even if eventually proven to not have been abusive, the financial costs of defending oneself against a potential criminal child abuse case and a family law custody battle simply make it not worth the risk to spank a child or use any other form of physical punishment.

There are many books available, and counselors with whom one may speak with regarding alternate forms of discipline and punishment that may be more appropriate.

While it is important to maintain discipline during and after a divorce, one should be cautioned to consider the possible consequences before choosing to spank a child.


Please feel free to contact our firm for a free telephonic consultation.   www.mcguiregardner.com

Tags: , , , , ,
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Is Facebook Causing Divorces?

Friday, May 7th, 2010

Is Facebook Causing Divorces?

An international article was recently published online (http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Tech/Social-Media/Facebook-fuelling-divorce/articleshow/5885855.cms) discussing the causal effect of increased use of Facebook and other networking websites in divorces.  The article stated that as many as 20% of British Divorces made mention of Facebook as a part of the cause.

In Arizona, it will be much more difficult to assess the impact of social networks, as Arizona is a no-fault divorce state so specific allegations of infidelity are not required in court paperwork.

While the impact of Facebook on divorces comes in many forms, the most typical is the rekindling of long lost love or the locating of a first love from childhood days and the associated re-kindling of that romance.

Because of the reduced barriers when on-line, flirting that would never occur in person often does occur over the internet and people who may not have otherwise allowed themselves to become emotionally and romantically unfaithful to a current spouse may find that is exactly what has happened.

To contact an Arizona divorce lawyer, please check out our website at www.yourarizondivorcelawyer.com.

Tags: , , ,
Posted in family law | No Comments »

How One Judge Defines Legal Custody:

Friday, March 5th, 2010

Legal custody, usually either joint legal custody or sole legal custody, is the decision legal right/responsibility for decision making regarding the children.  It is not the amount of time each parent spends with the children.

 

The concept of what is included in legal decision making may vary from Judge to Judge, but generally encompasses major decisions in the areas of education, religion, and medical treatment of the children.

 

One Judge, a former family law attorney herself, recently put out a short list of the major decisions that would require both parent’s decision in a joint legal custody case.  The Judge first clarifies that day to day decisions are to be made by the parent with whom the child is staying at a given time (for example, what type of cereal to have for breakfast or what cartoon characters to have on band-aids).  These small day to day decisions do not require an agreement between both parents.  However, the following decisions should be discussed by the parents in a joint legal custody case before proceeding:

 

1.                  Enrollment or termination of enrollment in a particular school or school program.

2.                  Advancing or holding back in school.

3.                  Beginning or ending the regular practice of a religion.

4.                  Arranging for child care providers for long term and/or after school child care.

5.                  Selecting non-emergency medical, dental, orthodontic and/or psychological services.

6.                  Authorizing the child’s driver’s license.

7.                  Authorizing employment for the child.

8.                  Authorizing the child’s marriage.

9.                  Authorizing the child’s enlistment into the Armed Forces.

10.              Passport application for the child.

11.              Authorizing sex education for the child.

12.              Arranging or permitting regularly occurring extracurricular activities for the child.

13.              Authorizing the purchase of an automobile for the child.

14.              Authorizing or consenting to the minor donating blood.

 

The Judge clarified that this is not an exhaustive list, but rather a list to suggest the types of decisions that should be made jointly in joint custody cases.  When the parties cannot reach an agreement, they should either seek mediation or Court involvement to resolve the conflict.

 

For more information, or to contact an Arizona divorce lawyer, please check out our website at www.yourarizondivorcelawyer.com. 

Tags: , ,
Posted in family law | No Comments »

« Older Entries